The Rotting West Collapses, Sinking into Absolute Sin and Islamization
- sergioschrys
- Nov 26, 2025
- 15 min read
Deconstruction, Woke Theology, and the Pornographic Transformation of the Western Human! When Pornography and Islam Fuse into One, Reaping Every Remaining Notion of Humanity and Christian Identity…

A government minister (Domna Michailidou, Minister of the New Democracy party) appearing at a public conference, participating in a discussion about the “anachronism of monogamy,” and even wondering aloud whether monogamy is now… outdated! A German pastor, almost on the same day, “blessing” four (!) men in a polyamorous — “many loves together” — marriage! And a Europe desperately searching for new identities simply because it has lost its very soul…
Written by Pirinos Logios My God, what are we witnessing! These things I mentioned above, are not isolated incidents. They are not mere “eccentricities.” They are not drunken anomalies of History. It is History itself , that is ashamed — deeply ashamed — to record what it sees. And History, when it ceases to be guided by virtue, is propelled by delirium.
The Gloom of Post-Christian Decay…
The Western world today, resembles those colossal structures of antiquity that do not collapse from an earthquake, but begin to crack from within — from an internal rot that spreads stealthily from foundation to foundation, until the entire edifice, once thought invincible, starts to lean ever so subtly, almost imperceptibly at first.
And yet, if one stands still for just a few minutes and observes the horizon, he realizes that the West no longer stands where the sun sets, but where a civilization stands that no longer remembers who it once was — and above all, whom it betrayed.
How the West Descended into the Madness of the Woke Agenda and its Absolute Moral Collapse
Europe appears to be coming to an end.
Or—perhaps more accurately—it has already ended, and its death simply hasn’t been officially announced yet. It did not vanish overnight, nor did it perish in a violent explosion. It gasped its last breath in the manner of civilizations that forget their spiritual roots: slowly and corrosively.
It lost its faith in the God who gave it birth, renounced the moral order that shaped it, and destroyed the memory that grounded it.
Thus, the civilization that once emerged from the cosmic convergence of Hellenic wisdom, Roman jurisprudence, and the Christian revelation now staggers within a void that is not merely moral, but profoundly ontological.
And the recent image from Berlin — a pastor “blessing” four men in a ritualistic “pop-up wedding,” as the modern-day antichrists now call it — is not merely a grotesque vignette. It is the emblem of a continent stripping its own history bare, as if determined to dismantle the very foundations that made it a bastion of civilization for centuries.
We are not facing a “progressive” Europe.
We are facing an unhistorical, spiritually blind Europe — one that attempts to rewrite theology through the language of psychology, biology through the lens of fantasy, and anthropology through the impulses of desire.
And that is precisely where the darkness begins.
To grasp the magnitude of today’s decline, one must summon to memory the grandeur of the past. For the civilization that collapses before us is not an ordinary one; it is the civilization that served as the foundation of humanity for two millennia.
Romanía — the Eastern Roman Empire of the Greek nation, later renamed “Byzantium” by the Franks out of political convenience — was the only empire in history that fused Hellenic reason, Roman political structure, and, above all, the Orthodox Christian truth.
It was not an empire of spear and blood, as the empires of the West were.
It was an empire of meaning — an empire that believed politics to be an extension of theology, and power to be a responsibility, not a spoil.
The Greek spirit, which had taught the world how to think, encountered the Christian Logos, which taught the world how to be saved. And that encounter became the most significant cultural event in human history.
That world fell on May 29th, 1453.
The walls collapsed, but the worldview endured for centuries afterward—until the modern West decided to tear it out of its own memory.
The Schism of 1054 was not a theological footnote; it was a world-shaping rupture. The West essentially chose to sever the umbilical cord binding it to the Orthodox tradition and to set itself adrift.
From the moment the Pope demanded to become the sole, absolute authority, the West changed course. The great Fathers—John Chrysostom, Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian—no longer inspired her.
Or rather, she came to see them as “Graecized contaminants.”
In their place arose the Scholastics, the juridical formulations, and a theology that became an instrument of power rather than a path of healing.
Later, the Protestant Reformation would wound the West even more deeply. As the Russian-German theologian and university professor Johann Meyendorff notes, “The Reformation was, in truth, an attempt to free Western Christianity from the scholastic framework of thought and return it to Scripture and the early Church.”
But Luther, Calvin, and their successors did not merely ask for renewal — they demanded the self-deification of the believer.
Each person, with his book in his hand and his desire in his heart, became a “church” unto himself.
And when everyone becomes a church, then no Church exists at all.
This was the first great rupture.
From that moment on, God in the West began to fade into the background.
He was no longer the Father who saves, but an abstract idea that could fit inside philosophical constructs or personal interpretations.
Along with divinity, anthropology began to vanish from the center of Western thought.
Man was no longer a person; he became a subject of desires.
And when desire becomes the normative measure of life, society ceases to build itself upon stable foundations and begins to construct itself upon the shifting psychology of fleeting moments.
On such eroded “ground,” the family becomes a “contract” (the famous marriage contracts), marriage becomes a “right,” love becomes a “negotiation,” and identity becomes “liquid.”
And out of the ruins of this world, the woke phenomenon emerges.
The Woke Religion: The New “Reformation” of the West
The woke agenda, as an ideology, is not in essence a social movement. It is a new religion.
It has its dogmas, its “theology,” its “martyrs,” and even its sacred rituals.
Its three great creeds have been stated before in different ways; I merely decode them.
The first — and most crucial — is the boiling point:
“Man self-creates.”
In other words, they tell us that nature does not exist, therefore nothing is given. Everything is an act of self-invention.
The second concerns desire:
“Desire is sacred.”
Whatever I feel I am — whatever I self-identify as — must be institutionally recognized.
Am I biologically male but feel female? Then others, and of course the state, must accept it.
Am I a woman but feel that I am… hermaphroditic, and have only a female name? Then I have the “right” to add a male name beside it.
And finally, built upon the first two, comes the inevitable conclusion:
“Identity is divinity.”
Therefore it must be worshipped, protected, and legislated.
The woke ideology is the most perfected weapon of the Satanist–Kabbalist globalist elites.
Its intentions are painfully simple: it seeks to create a new human being — one without a past, without a family, without faith, and without boundaries in his inner world.
The only limitation this new “religion” recognizes is the right of desire. Everything must submit to it: laws, institutions, churches, schools — every structure that shapes society.
And with this explanation in mind, we understand precisely where ceremonies like the one in Berlin originate — or monstrosities like last year’s Paris Olympics opening ritual.
A pink-haired pastor, four men, “multicolored blessings” that resemble festivals rather than sacraments, and all the grotesque theatrics that accompany such spectacles.
And then the crowning question — a question that would make the Holy Fathers of Orthodoxy weep:
“What would God have to say if instead of two, there were four?”
This sentence captures with chilling accuracy the mutation of Western theology.
God is no longer Revelation; He becomes a psychological tool.
He is no longer the Father who speaks truth; He becomes a mirror of desires.
Marriage — the so-called “pop-up” marriage — is no longer the union of two persons in a primordial communion ordered toward family and the birth of new life.
It becomes a “negotiation between interested parties”, with no purpose except the “entertainment” of a filthy, vomit-inducing form of sex — precisely the kind paraded across porn sites under the title “Family Sex Therapy.”
There is no sacrament left.
The only “mystery” that remains is a cheap imitation of performance art.
The Church becomes a stage, and the “priest” becomes an entertainer with a carnival costume.
And God?
God is politely exiled from His own house.
The West Collapses with Pornography as Its Banner
If there is one element that reveals the depth of the decline, it is pornography.
Not merely as an image, but as an entire architecture of power.
Pornography, far beyond being an industry of visuals, now functions like a subtle and insidious mechanism of domination and control.
A mechanism that conquers not through violence, but through hypnosis.
One that does not attack the body, but the gaze and the subconscious — and does not manipulate man from the outside, but disarms him from within.
Pornography grew underground, through the so-called art films and the French nouvelle vague. In the beginning, there was merely a naked female form and an image that silently alluded to other, more suggestive “images.”
Then, through the “sexual revolution,” the German — and later the Scandinavian — studios of the mid-1960s began timidly producing short films, screened as “dirty reels” in seedy theaters, usually after spaghetti-western movies (their audience almost entirely male). By the early 1970s, pornography had already developed at lightning speed.
Protestant Germany began producing fully structured films — some aimed at the seedy underworld (pure hardcore pornography with continuous action), and others aimed at the general adult public (married couples), built around various storylines with straight sexual acts.
France created its own form of “porn,” with the distinctive French stylization, and exported it across Europe, while Britain remained a spectator, importing films from these countries due to its entrenched Puritanism.
But pornography’s attempt to infiltrate family entertainment — to corrode the family itself — achieved total success with the now “legendary” film Deep Throat, starring the late Linda Lovelace.
It was the film that decriminalized pornography in America and became the first commercially successful production of the genre.
Deep Throat shattered the box office — it was even included among the top 10 highest-grossing films of the year — catapulting pornographic cinema into mainstream culture and opening wide the gates for family porn.
In other words, the purpose of the “architects” behind its promotion was the deliberate liberation — or rather, the complete ABOLITION — of moral boundaries, since everyone saw it, and everyone openly admitted to having seen it.
The pornography industry soon found a permanent home in Hollywood, producing 60–100 films every year to supply the entire Western market. These films were screened in “specialized” theaters frequented mostly by solitary men of all ages — even the elderly.
After a few years, prostitutes also frequented these theaters, “fishing” for clients for oral sex in front of the glowing cinema screen.
In Greece, pornography arrived at nearly the same time as in the rest of the European West.
Commercial cinema, after the invasion of television into Greek homes, suffered a massive crisis. Producers — except for Finos Film — in order to survive, turned to cheap soft-porn productions, creating new “stars” as well as new… spectators who never missed the chance to see Anna Fonsou naked, the explosive Maria Ioannidou performing a sensual striptease in Gynaikokratia, and the second-tier actresses Gizela Dali, Rena Kosmidou, Natasha O’Fry, Tina Spathi, and others.
But the true objective of the “architects” pushing this trend had not been achieved.
The theatres screening these films were not spaces for couples — but for solitary men with questionable intentions.
Thus, with the revolution of home video recorders, pornography invaded the living rooms of Europeans and Americans and demolished the family from within, corrupting it.
Video clubs created “special” sections for these films, and the companies distributing them were flooded with warm cash. Corruption and moral decay made their first visible appearance.
Women, now “emancipated” and liberated from patriarchy, began — along with the rise of private clubs — to dress provocatively and transform themselves into… something else. Certainly not into the archetype of wife, mother, and homemaker.
Simultaneously, under the deep influence of domestic pornography, closed wife-swapping clubs emerged, satisfying the erotic fantasies of couples through free sex — often accompanied by light drugs.
The New Age of the satanic globalist elite had already corrupted the very bearer of life — the woman herself — with immeasurable consequences.
With the dawn of the digital era, pornography became a public spectacle across the West. Porn sites multiplied endlessly, “educating” not only adults and couples but also teenagers.
After 2005, with the rise of smartphones capable of video recording, teenagers began creating their own “porn films,” performing unspeakable acts inside school classrooms with their classmates — who participated eagerly — and uploading the videos online.
This resulted in a scandal that was swiftly swept under the rug to avoid further consequences. Furthermore, in a report published in the newspaper "Ta Nea" on May 19, 2009, we read that teenagers, mainly boys aged 15 and above and girls aged 14 and above, were now... a sex life, and indeed in its most extreme form, since children imitate what they see. The result is tragic, to say the least. Most girls who are now in their 30s have almost destroyed their uteruses from successive changes of partners and have serious problems with their pregnancies. A significant percentage of women of this generation are unable to conceive and resort to in vitro fertilization with dramatic consequences... Today, hundreds of millions of people consume pornography daily on pornographic websites. Entire generations become addicted before even reaching puberty; sexuality is severed from intimacy and transformed into an industrial commodity.
Therefore, pornography did not appear randomly. It was — and remains — a product of the globalist Kabbalist elite, created to shape a new generation of meta-humans, in whose very existence the word “morality” will not simply be absent — it will be forbidden.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World is now here.
Pornography does not “entertain” man. It disintegrates him.
It strips him of the capacity for real relationship, reduces the body to an object, destroys modesty — that delicate veil that protects the soul — and cultivates loneliness, addiction, and above all, disorientation.
And the worst part? It is not supported by fringe networks, but by colossal political and economic mechanisms tied to the same centers of international power that promote the woke agenda.
Pornography is neither progress nor any form of social advancement. It is a deliberate strategy to dissolve the individual and to annihilate the very meaning of the traditional family.
It runs parallel to the creation of a “new form of family,” where spouses will no longer be two — but perhaps three or four.
And as for childbearing?
That issue is already being bypassed.
There now exist artificial-womb facilities, where the embryo will “develop” so that the body of the woman — or the women of the new “open families” — will not be “damaged.” God help us...
Islamic Penetration: The Void Never Remains Empty
When a civilization abandons its identity, someone else inherits it. Europe is not experiencing a “peaceful entry” of new populations. It is undergoing a long-term demographic and cultural displacement, unfolding not by accident, but based on a coherent, deeply rooted theological and civilizational aim of Islam.
For Islam — like any religion that possesses a total worldview, theological certainty, and historical memory — does not see itself as “one religion among many,” but as the end of history: the final form of faith and social order which, according to its own doctrine, is destined to replace all previous ones.
From this perspective, today’s Europe — which opened its… gates to allow in every form of Muslim human residue with intentions anything but noble — is not foreign territory.
It is a target.
A target that has already grown weak institutionally, demographically, spiritually, and culturally.
Europe, no matter how unwilling it is to admit it, stands today before a profound historical irony. As it renounces its Christian foundation in the name of a “progressive” hyper-individualism, it throws its doors wide open to a civilization that has no intention of assimilating, but every intention of replacing.
Islam does not enter Europe as a guest. It enters as a competing civilization — with remarkable internal cohesion, uncompromising principles, a strong demographic base, and a religio-legal system that seeks not coexistence, but dominion.
And here lies the critical point that connects woke polyamory with Islamic polygamy.
The globalist agenda deliberately legitimizes a model of family dissolution that serves as a preparatory chamber for the institutional penetration of Islamic polygamy.
In every major European metropolis — from Paris to Stockholm — the demographic picture is tragically unforgiving. The native European population is shrinking, aging, and losing its younger generations, while Muslim communities display triple to quintuple birth rates, collective and traditional family structures, zero abandonment of religious identity, and clear intergenerational cohesion.
It is telling that in many regions of France, Belgium, and Germany, Muslims under the age of 20, reach or exceed 30–40% of the local population.
In a century where demography equals geopolitical power, Europe is already undergoing genetic dissolution and is losing because it refuses to continue itself, while Islam wins because it insists on remaining what it has always been.
The average European consciousness views polygamy as an exotic relic. But in Islamic civilization, it is neither an “exception” nor a “deviation,” but a fully theologically and legally sanctioned institution. Islam permits men up to four wives, unlimited procreation, and family structures that act as demographic multipliers.
And here the crucial paradox emerges: Europe officially “prohibits” polygamy on paper, but allows imported polygamy in practice through the woke agenda and the newly fashionable polyamorous “marriage.”
Thousands of Muslim families live in de facto polygamous structures — with one wife in Europe and a second or third in their homeland; with children scattered across multiple countries; with welfare benefits that support entire family clusters; and with religious “marriages” completely beyond the reach of any European authority.
The Khaled Al Anesi Case in the Netherlands Was No Accident
The Khaled Al Anesi case in the Netherlands was not accidental.
It was the first major, deliberate attempt to exploit the legal framework of human rights in order to usher polygamy in through the back door.
And the worst part is this: the very legal arsenal that enables it is provided by woke ideology itself.
Woke Polyamory – The Trojan Horse of Institutionalized Polygamy
Here lies the core of what I want to develop: The woke legitimization of polyamorous relationships functions as the political, legal, and linguistic groundwork for the acceptance of Islamic polygamy.
Why? Because the rhetoric is identical.
“You cannot limit… Love to just two!”
“The number of partners is a social construct!”
“Monogamy is an outdated remnant of patriarchy!”
“Family must be defined by desires, not by institutions!”
“Polyamory is a matter of… human rights!”
If this language becomes embedded in the legal system, then Islamic polygamy can present itself as:
a cultural right,
a religious freedom,
an integration framework (inclusion),
a personal choice,
a form of respect for diversity,
and so on.
In other words, the woke framework constructs the judicial and political conditions for polygamy to become first a “legal exception,” and ultimately, a fully established institution.
Berlin — with the pastor who blessed four men — is doing exactly this.
It unlocks the vocabulary and the emotional framework for a future “recognition of family forms beyond two individuals.”
And once Europe embraces this, who do you think will exploit it first and most effectively?
The average German?
The average Swede?
Or the religiously structured Islamic communities that already practice it, and are simply waiting for legalization to solidify it?
The convergence between woke family dissolution and Islam’s insistence on populous, hierarchical, patriarchal family structures is not accidental. Behind the dismantling of traditional Western society lies the globalist logic that seeks a world without native identities, without national cohesion, without religious continuity, and without structures of stability.
A liquid world, where people are easily moved, easily manipulated, and, naturally, easily replaced.
In this model, woke ideology destroys the traditional Christian European family, while Islam introduces a population entirely unaffected by woke deconstruction.
The result is a demographic imbalance that multiplies, and Europe transforms not into a multicultural continent, but into a continent with two opposing populations:
one deconstructed,
and one hyper-coherent.
The outcome? The scales tilt not toward “pseudo-progressivism,” but toward the harshest form of cultural dominance.
And thus the circle closes.
Europe, digs its own grave and collapses socially and culturally.
The same continent that legislates “third parents,” signs laws on “multi-parenthood,” promotes polyamorous structures, dismantles the man–woman pair, dissolves the family, and treats monogamy as an “anachronism” (Domna Michailidou, Minister of Family and Social Cohesion), is the very continent that now witnesses — mathematically, statistically, culturally, religiously — the rise of a population that neither deconstructs, nor assimilates, nor retreats
This population will not simply fill the cities. It will fill the playgrounds, the school classrooms, the public sector, the parliaments — exactly as happened in Britain, where numerous cities, including London, are governed by mayors and officials who are foreigners, Indians, and Muslims.
And when the time comes for the issue of the “polygamy exception” to be raised, the door will not be opened by a mufti. It will be opened by a “random” woke conference, a human-rights court, or an “enlightened” equality committee.
Polyamory will be the façade.
Polygamy will be the institutional passageway.
And demographic overturn will be the result.
Western Europe will not need to be “conquered.” Suleiman the Magnificent may have failed in the first siege of Vienna in October 1529; Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa may have failed a century and a half later in September 1683; God may have spared the Western world from the scimitar of Turkish Islam — but today, things are different.
Today, the West has surrendered the throne voluntarily, betrayed by its vulgar and corrupt leaders.
Epilogue
As simple — or even paradoxical — as it may sound, the Western world is ending.
We have perhaps reached the final reckoning of History itself. Or, to be more precise, it ended long ago.
Not by swords, not by wars (the Turks, after all, lost their heads five centuries ago at the siege of Vienna), and not even by “invasions,” as the decrepit and corrupt Ursula pretends to “fear.”
It died by a slow, almost ritualistic suicide that lasted for centuries.
Western Europe, which once received light from Christ, died from its own de-Christianization.
And the more stubbornly it tries to build a new world without God, the deeper it sinks into the void.
Yet, within this darkness, one sees a faint but persistent glimmer:
the memory of the Eastern Roman Empire of the Greek nation — the much-sung, much-suffered Romanía — a world that never truly died, but waits to be recalled.
For history never leaves its voids unused. And when the bright parts of a civilization fade, the flame of those that endured through time returns to demand its place.
The West is disappearing. But not all of Europe.
The Greek/Roman world — nourished by Orthodoxy — has never spoken its final word.
And perhaps — I dare say — this strange, almost metaphysical historical collapse may indeed be the beginning of our great return.
For when everything around you darkens, even a single spark from the East is enough to show the path.
The path God has carved for Romiosyni...
Pirinos Logios sergioschrys@outlook.com






Comments